Tuner923
Full Access Member
sweeeett!!!!! man... that infiniboost tune you're talking bout, is that also hidden from the stealership and selectable? if so we might have a change in plans?
Epic day at the dyno
- Thread starter Projekt
- Start date
elecblue06
Full Access Member
yes it is
and what were exact numbers.. see if he can smooth out that little dip right after peak trq and you'll get a few more whp out of it
1WhiteSSTC
Banned
am i reading that right? almost 400wtq peak but then it drops back to approx 300wtq? either way great numbers. I am glad to see some really good tuning happening for the LNF Cobalts, infiniboost sounds very promising and hopefully next year I can have it for my LNF, along with many other goodies -)
elecblue06
Full Access Member
fixed the tilt and added some lines to make it easier to read
hb_ss/tc
Full Access Member
elecblue06
Full Access Member
Whatevers
I still tell people I got only 243whp.
exactly.. it's better that wya.. lulz.. that way .. if they win .. well i only have 243 whp.. and if you lose it's ROFLZORZ I ONLY HAVE 243 WHP LAWLZ
thats what i tell people too.. well i dyno'd at 252 whp 209 wtrq lol
hb_ss/tc
Full Access Member
I know right?
243whp BUT 340wtq. lol
243whp BUT 340wtq. lol
aren't the other "procharged" LSjs and 2.2L putting down ridiculously weak numbers??? like in the 270whp range? or are they breaking 300? I know the TVS is considered to be the best blower out... but even they have topped out at 350whp... and while that is great, look at that LNFs torque curve... and things are about to get sick with these cars... I know ZZP is already working on getting some of the major fueling issues worked out and they've already broke 11s on the stock turbo.... how many blown cars have done that again?
horsepower looks good on paper, torque wins races
and the thing with direct injection is always, fueling... you will make more horsepower in the end, or have the potential to... and want an example of that? compare a tune only 2.0L LNF to a tune only 2.4L Srt-4 neon, and shit, we have a MUCH smaller stock turbo and yet STILL put down higher numbers with less displacement... the major problem that has to be researched with D.I. is being able to get the correct fueling to supply that power... and its why right now even swapped turbo cars are not well over 400whp... but things are about to get interesting as vendors and tuners learn to manage the fueling on these cars... it won't be long before there are several 400+whp builds and probably some high 300s on the stock turbo(well that might be a stretch, but well over 350whp)
I will eventually probably go to the Mitsubishi 16g, its good for over 400whp on the Evos and I suspect Cobalts will see those results from it once the fueling gets worked out...
Last edited:
Projekt
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2009
- Posts
- 911
- Reaction score
- 0
thanks for the comments guys.
apparently that procharger ion didnt want to meet up when i was in his state..oh wellz. he can save his money for next time.
over winter im ordering a gt30..already talked to vulcan about making the manifold..i want close to 500 whp all said and done.
apparently that procharger ion didnt want to meet up when i was in his state..oh wellz. he can save his money for next time.
over winter im ordering a gt30..already talked to vulcan about making the manifold..i want close to 500 whp all said and done.
mrsilent13
Full Access Member
lol....i only made 144whp and 210wtq....lol when i was on 10psi...which is completely off...same dyno that hb_ss/tc ran on....lol
so...how does it feel to be making all the fucking torque...man i cant even imagine it...very nice numbers
so...how does it feel to be making all the fucking torque...man i cant even imagine it...very nice numbers
Last edited:
elecblue06
Full Access Member
his car went in the shop for a new clutch.. and it took longer then expected
and 08inobama.. there aren't any other procharged cars except me the procharged 2.2 ion i installed, 06_ion2 and maybe a few more in colorado.. none of the 2.2's have dynoed... however I do know there was one that put down 212 whp and like 190 wtrq in colorado a while ago..
the 2.0 balt put down 346 on the procharger with a 2.55 pulley.. which is the next pulley i'll be going to but i have his kit...
so you're running low 13s...... and the 350whp guy... what is he running? or is he another one of those "I don't have any times for it" guys that essentially has a dyno queen... i mean there are some 1000hp Supras out there that have never broke 10s
Last edited:
elecblue06
Full Access Member
i have the 2.0's kit.. so he hasn't ran anything for about a year if not more..
05Turbo2.2
Full Access Member
FGT you got no idea! U MAD?
i hope you forged the motor, the stock 2.2 rods will snap at 250ish wtrq
elecblue06
Full Access Member
Signature
its alive!!!!!!!!!!!!
procharged!
Current Mods: wiesco pistons, eagle rods, c-1 procharger , B&G Coilovers, cammed, patriot head, 60lb injectors, trifecta tuned, 2.4tb, vulcan intake mani, spec clutch, FMIC, zzp header/dp, 3 inch exhaust, , zex wet kit
thats his sig from another forum
Jn2
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2009
- Posts
- 1,779
- Reaction score
- 1
in that area give or take pending on engine and supprting mods...interviewatruins is running a 2.8" pulley on 16psi, and his engine has been holding fine, and with the 2.8" he should be in the 250whp range...i still need to dyno mine, when i went they didnt have time to do my dyno
05Turbo2.2
Full Access Member
in that area give or take pending on engine and supprting mods...interviewatruins is running a 2.8" pulley on 16psi, and his engine has been holding fine, and with the 2.8" he should be in the 250whp range...i still need to dyno mine, when i went they didnt have time to do my dyno
yep. and thats fine. i'm talking about the torque number not the horse power number. I've already proven that its not the horse power number braking the rods, its the torque number.