official 1/8th and 1/4 mile times

lwpmoon

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Posts
13
Reaction score
0
I'm a 06 2.2 Cobalt coupe (Car #895) Right lane

Mods= Turbo ~10psi, crappy tune, 2.4 mani, full exhaust, street tires, my first time on the track ever, and high altitude (~5800')

SCAN0011.jpg
 
Last edited:

2001CamaroSS

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Posts
24
Reaction score
0
Can I post my 13.3 @ 106? That was on my Z28 with only 1 ever pass on the track with just bolt-ons... and a 8.8 @ 83mph 1/8th mile time. Like I said, only ever ran once, I think if I had actually launched the car, I would have maybe a high 12 pass with just full exhaust and intake. That run was on a 2.1 60'
 

Cobalt Tom

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2009
Posts
3,056
Reaction score
0
Location
Auburn, WA
Can I post my 13.3 @ 106? That was on my Z28 with only 1 ever pass on the track with just bolt-ons... and a 8.8 @ 83mph 1/8th mile time. Like I said, only ever ran once, I think if I had actually launched the car, I would have maybe a high 12 pass with just full exhaust and intake. That run was on a 2.1 60'
ill make a section for none ecotecs and add you
 

ACE

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Posts
1,056
Reaction score
0
Location
texas biatch
Can I post my 13.3 @ 106? That was on my Z28 with only 1 ever pass on the track with just bolt-ons... and a 8.8 @ 83mph 1/8th mile time. Like I said, only ever ran once, I think if I had actually launched the car, I would have maybe a high 12 pass with just full exhaust and intake. That run was on a 2.1 60'

stop bragging
 

elecblue06

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2009
Posts
427
Reaction score
0
Location
newburgh, ny
IMAG0142.jpg


i guess i'll post my shitty time lol i need to get my car back together and hit the track again lol ... new suspension will help alot with those 60' times lol 2.4 60's ftl lol
 

Cobalt Tom

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2009
Posts
3,056
Reaction score
0
Location
Auburn, WA
Im sorry, but im not bragging, just stating the fact that I had no idea I was even going to run that time... :sorrysign: :emotions33:
its all good ;)

---------- Post added at 06:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:27 PM ----------

ill update the list this weekend
 

Tuner923

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2009
Posts
4,465
Reaction score
0
Location
Norristown, PA
ju7j7r.jpg


Tuner923

RT: 0.75
60ft: 2.26
330ft: 6.11
1/8 ET: 9.20
1/8MPH: 80.34
1/4 ET: 13.9615
1/4MPH: 101.17

mods: I/T/ST
 

YelloEye

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 18, 2009
Posts
7,601
Reaction score
24
Location
Renton, WA
Anybody else notice that Tom's cammed balt is only .05 slower in the quarter than a stock SS/TC?
 

mrsilent13

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Posts
656
Reaction score
0
Location
Moreno Valley, Ca
Anybody else notice that Tom's cammed balt is only .05 slower in the quarter than a stock SS/TC?

i thought a stock ss/tc ran 14.1 stock with a good driver...im sure i read that in 2 magz. actually, i think one said 14.1 and the other said 14.3 i think.
 

YelloEye

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 18, 2009
Posts
7,601
Reaction score
24
Location
Renton, WA
i thought a stock ss/tc ran 14.1 stock with a good driver...im sure i read that in 2 magz. actually, i think one said 14.1 and the other said 14.3 i think.

Its not what its able to do, but what the driver can make it do. The 1st post has him .05 behind the TC thats up there.
 

mrsilent13

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Posts
656
Reaction score
0
Location
Moreno Valley, Ca
Its not what its able to do, but what the driver can make it do. The 1st post has him .05 behind the TC thats up there.

hmm i just saw that...looks like he need a driver mod...lol

---------- Post added at 01:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:52 AM ----------

the ss/tc has a really bad 60' and low trap speed
 

YelloEye

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 18, 2009
Posts
7,601
Reaction score
24
Location
Renton, WA
hmm i just saw that...looks like he need a driver mod...lol

---------- Post added at 01:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:52 AM ----------

the ss/tc has a really bad 60' and low trap speed

Likely, or the track had really bad prep.
 

ionit3

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2009
Posts
1,637
Reaction score
1
Location
o town fl
can someone fix this for me i dont have a computer at the moment :'(
 

Tuner923

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2009
Posts
4,465
Reaction score
0
Location
Norristown, PA
Anybody else notice that Tom's cammed balt is only .05 slower in the quarter than a stock SS/TC?

14.9 was my first run ever @ a track... i posted a 14.30 and it was never updated.. The track sucks ass and racing in the triple digit to high 90's temps sucks.. I am sure i could have hit 14.00 stock.




13.9 is my first time at the track since tuned, and i had no helmet so night was over for me.

ju7j7r.jpg


Tuner923

RT: 0.75
60ft: 2.26
330ft: 6.11
1/8 ET: 9.20
1/8MPH: 80.34
1/4 ET: 13.9615
1/4MPH: 101.17

mods: I/T/ST



I am in no way a bad driver i was just a newb at the track..we have a 08 ss/tc same mods as me running 15's and 16's last night that is rediculous. I am the 2nd fastest of our crew and that is only to SUKXOST from css.net
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
7,449
Posts
156,494
Members
4,422
Latest member
budeuce
Top